My submission is done. To summarise, I'm upset that a poor quality specification, developed by one vendor, submitted with no consultation is even being considered for an international standard.
I don't think Standards Australia get it. How they treat this will determine the relevance of international standards in technology. Not just because Microsoft has Silverlight lined up to take the same path. But because there is a need for aspirational standards-making and if ISO are not going to be that forum, then it will occur elsewhere.